Javed Akhtar, the renowned Indian poet, lyricist, and screenwriter, has expressed a clear and thoughtful stance regarding the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its potential impact on the film industry, particularly concerning writers and actors. His views often center on the need to protect human creativity and intellectual property while acknowledging the inevitability of technological advancement.
One of Akhtar’s primary concerns revolves around the potential for AI to be used in ways that undermine the work of human writers. He has vocally highlighted the legal and ethical challenges posed by AI-generated content. For a writer like him, whose professional life is built on original thought and expression, the idea of machines creating narratives or lyrics raises significant questions about authorship and compensation.
Akhtar fears that if studios or producers begin utilizing AI to generate scripts or partial content, it could lead to a devaluation of the human writer’s contribution. He emphasizes that the unique perspectives, emotional depth, and cultural nuances embedded in a human-written piece cannot be replicated by an algorithm.
He often advocates for stronger copyright laws and regulations that specifically address AI-generated content to ensure that human creators are credited and fairly remunerated, and their original work is not simply used as training data without permission. The core issue for him is maintaining the sanctity of intellectual property.
Beyond writing, Akhtar has also commented on the impact of AI on actors, specifically in the context of deepfakes and digital mimicry. The ability of AI to digitally replicate an actor’s voice, face, and performance poses a serious threat to their identity and livelihood.
He understands that while AI tools could potentially be used for complex visual effects or historical recreations, the danger lies in their unauthorized or exploitative use. An actor’s voice, likeness, and performance are their brand and their most valuable assets. Akhtar stresses that clear legal frameworks are crucial to prevent the misuse of an actor’s digital persona after their death, or even while they are alive.
He insists that actors must have the ultimate control over the use of their digital likeness and must be compensated for any performance that utilizes their digital twin, even if the actual performance is rendered by a computer. This is about protecting the actor’s persona rights in the digital age.
It is important to note that Akhtar’s stance is not one of outright rejection of technology. He is a pragmatist who recognizes that AI is a tool that will inevitably become integrated into the industry. His focus is instead on ethical implementation and strong regulation.
He suggests that the film industry, including producers, writers, actors, and other guilds, must proactively collaborate with governments and legal experts to establish clear guidelines. These guidelines should ensure that AI serves as an assistant to human creativity, rather than a replacement for it. To know such latest updates, stay tuned to tellyboosters.com Thank you
