The legal battle surrounding the upcoming controversial Hindi film Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legal has intensified, with the filmmakers informing the Delhi High Court that the movie does not yet possess a censor certificate. This crucial statement was made by the legal counsel representing the producers during a highly anticipated court hearing, which addressed a plea filed by Bollywood superstar Salman Khan seeking an immediate stay on the film’s release. Responding to arguments from Salman Khan’s legal team regarding the urgency of a judicial intervention to prevent an imminent theatrical release, the defense counsel countered by clarifying that a movie cannot legally hit theaters anywhere in the country without official clearance from the Central Board of Film Certification. To provide absolute clarity and reassurance to the bench, the makers formally assured the court that the project has not even been submitted to the regulatory body for approval yet, adding a firm undertaking that they will not send the film to the censor board until the scheduled next hearing.
Taking note of these key developments, Justice Jyoti Singh deferred the proceedings and listed the matter for its next comprehensive hearing, allowing time for the actor’s legal rejoinder to be formally placed on record. The entire legal dispute escalated significantly after the fifty-nine-year-old superstar moved the High Court, firmly contending that the film is an unauthorized, blatant reference to the decades-long blackbuck poaching case associated with him. Salman Khan’s petition highlights that the project directly infringes upon his personality rights and violates a previous protective interim court injunction granted in December last year to shield his image, name, and likeness from commercial exploitation. According to his legal team, the film’s promotional poster released on May twenty-nine features a main character who bears an undeniable physical resemblance to Salman, specifically highlighting the presence of a signature bracelet and ear studs that are instantly identifiable with the actor’s unique personal identity.
Furthermore, the lawsuit points out that while Salman Khan was officially acquitted of charges under the Arms Act by a Rajasthan court, the promotional poster misleadingly depicts the lookalike character holding a firearm. The plea strongly argues that this specific visual imagery spreads a false, defamatory narrative that stands completely contrary to official judicial records, accusing the producers of intentionally sensationalizing past legal controversies to capture public attention and generate cheap headlines at the cost of the actor’s hard-earned goodwill. In response, filmmaker Amit Jani has argued that a personality cannot claim absolute ownership over public legal proceedings or historical events covered widely by the media. The case has already sparked considerable friction within the entertainment industry, with certain cast members even choosing to distance themselves from the movie citing a refusal to support any target-driven narrative. As the High Court records the formal undertaking that neither the film nor its full trailer will move forward before the scheduled date, fans and industry experts are keeping a close watch on the court’s upcoming final stance.
To know such latest updates tuned tellyboosters.com Thank you
